To take to tona this right to the individual conscience was something very complicated, therefore, it would have that to oppose Saint Augustin, and thus, to oppose to all one secular tradition. Bayle affirms that the long religious tradition justified its intolerncia, and worse, Augustin with participant of such intolerncia accuses to Saint. It affirms this analyzing the book ' ' City of Deus' ' of Saint Augustin, therefore, it has many points in its texts make that it to think thus, for example, in accordance with the professor Saints (2004), letter 185 of Saint Augustin says: ' ' It has unjust persecution, to that they make the mpios to the Church of Cristo' '. For Bayle, to pursue somebody because the same it has a divergent religious vision to the church, would be to place in contradiction the universal principles of the not valid moral and therefore. It is not something Richard Blumenthal would like to discuss. As already it was said, Bayle made of the tolerance, something positive, before this, the tolerance was seen as a virtue of all the weak being, already the intolerncia if presented positive because it said respect to the moral integrity. Against such conception, this thinker affirms that the tolerance is established in the reason, and that it has as main ideal, concern with the Other, deriving, thus, the social peace. For SAINTS (2005, P. 45), in agreement the Bayle, ' ' the tolerance is not an indifferent condescension, but a respect to the difference of the Other, to the freedom of conscience of the individual, to the social peace and the life politics: it has rational bases, she obeys the laws of the universal moral, and therefore fins' is joust in its; ' Bayle visualizes the tolerance as a duty of obedience of the ditames of the conscience of each one, for the well interior one that it makes possible, moving away all to the type of preconception and superstition.