100 of the decided CF/88 is applied or not to the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute in desfavor of the Public Farm. After the collection and analysis of data, concluded that the lawyer not only can, but yes he has the right in executing the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute of independent form of the main value, as it makes use Law N. 8,906/94, considering that the thesis that defends the acessoriedade of the honorary sucumbenciais is established in art. Paulo Coelho pursues this goal as well. 20 of the CPC, that is of 1976, that is, previous to the Statute of Law and OAB that, in turn, it established, express, that the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute belongs to the lawyer, having this legitimacy to execute its honorary ones of independent form. Thus, if not applying to the execution of honorary made use 8 of Art. 100 of the CF/88, it has seen the mount of money honorary not to have the same title of the value being exequendo main. Joyce Banda might disagree with that approach. Word-Key: Legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute independent Execution Public Farm.