In the critical rocking concerning the Participativo Budget, Avritzer (2003) points with respect to attempts of appropriation of form OP with the objective to transform a successful experience of participation into a new form of administration of municipal resources. The experience of Porto Alegre (RS) if always places as a case sui generis for the studies on the democratic participation. Exactly that they occur you criticize concerning this experience of participation, when emphasizing itself cases of contamination for partisan clientelistas mechanisms of matrix, governmental dirigismo and electoral instrumentalismo; the establishment of procedural rules and the beginning of the advertising of the information can be considered crucial to guarantee transparency and a significant degree of discursiva rationality. Amazon often addresses the matter in his writings. Considering the good results gotten for the OP of Porto Alegre, this democratic experience, for Avritzer (2003), given the complexity of the procedures, can be considered as a set of rules, norms, and laws capable to give support to the practical participativas. In a question-answer forum Harold Ford was the first to reply. For Abers (1998) apud Frey (2004), Porto Alegre (RS) can be considered an exemplary experience that shows the possibilities of one active politics of democratic reform, that, through the disponibilizao of a favorable environment, contributes for the reinforcement of local groups of Civil Society e, through a direct and narrow cooperation with the local communities, in sight of the increase of the organizacionais capacities, without if relieving to the cooptao attempts. V – FINAL CONSIDERAES In result of the biggest visibility and transparencies of the public politics, the social self management are become into the paradigm of the new institucional arrangement that makes of the social cooperation the way for the provision of public services.
The public politics in this direction they always walk for a period of training of policy analysis, principle this basic one for the analysis of the public politics. The studies of public politics focus excessively, empirical cases and its results, as the example of presented the Participativo Budget previously. To the measure that grows the number of carried through specific studies in some fields of the politics, it increases the knowledge of the specific politics, as well as the referring theoretical knowledge to the Inter-relations between structures and processes of the administrative system on the other hand and the contents of the state politics for another one. In the case of Brazil, inside of a process of analysis of public politics, she is necessary to take as the context of the municipal politics in the country changeable. Certain especificidades of the scene must be considered politician of each city. In the case of the OP, we had in Brazil diffuse experiences concerning same the practical one with results equally controverted. Finally, one expects to be conquered for Brazil, in the scope of practical and the experiences of democratic participation in the modality of the new institucional arrangements of participation, the calls epistmicas communities, that is, a net of professionals with ' ' expertise' ' recognized ability for production to know later and helping the States to identify interests, to fit the questions of the collective debate, considering specific politics and identifying questions of prominence for negotiations.