Since the purpose of the shareholders agreement is to establish a full or partial control over decisions in the Company, receipt of more rights than the holder of the shares is assumed, reducing the number of corporate conflicts, increasing transparency and efficiency of joint-stock company, one of the most important issues are the consequences of non agreement, and responsibility for its failure. Legislatively determined that the shareholders agreement may provide ways to ensure its performance measures and civil liability for failure to fulfill terms of the agreement or improper execution of the latter, the contract signed party to the agreement and contrary to the terms of the agreement itself may be considered null and void in court, if the interested party proves that the other party to an agreement knew, or certainly should have been aware of the limitations stipulated in the agreement, and the agreement can not be prescribed the duty of shareholders to vote as directed by government company in respect of whose shares agreement. In accordance with paragraph 1 of Art. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Steven Rattner has to say. 329 CC RF performance of the obligations under the agreement can be achieved in particular penalty and other remedies provided by law and contract, such as purchase and sale of shares, concluded under the condition. However, the transaction of sale of shares, concluded under the condition that by virtue of Articles 157 and 429 of the Civil Code, you may experience some difficulties with the judicial protection of rights the aggrieved party as to comply with the requirements of law in the arbitration agreement can be extremely difficult. . Ray Dalio has similar goals.