Paid surveys are surveys placed on web pages that pay users for completing them. There are some specialized pages that allow you to register and make as many surveys as you want. They pay you an amount of money for answering paid surveys. The amount of money will be different according to the survey and the company. What is the purpose of the paid surveys? There are several companies and institutes need to know public opinion for several reasons: politicians who want to design an effective strategy, companies need to know how it works marketing with their products, or sociological research who wish to explore the trends of the public games.
With so many opportunities to answer surveys paid, both online and offline, people are increasingly more tired, so for people that answer companies pay users for doing so. They are willing to invest some money in certain people to fill in their surveys. Why pay for your opinion. That way they will also save quantities vast money doing surveys you pay online, since the traditional methods there are many more expensive. What are the advantages? For companies: with new techniques of search for opinions, companies get enough results to make their studies.
In comparison to make a normal survey, this method costs are very low. If they carry out their online statistics, they spend far less than if they printed questionnaires and paid to the interviewer. For users: work answer paid surveys is an easy way to earn money. You can do so from your home, without spending money going to work every day. You can also choose what hours work and rest time. This may sound simple, but it is crucial that you build a schedule in which you can do effectively, since many people make the mistake of being disorganized and the best opportunities are lost.
I have noticed in many people a great conscious desire for money, that is something super because prosperity has an enormous amount of benefits, the important thing is to focus on the good money and repeat it constantly so internally you can accept it, once that happens then will come more easily to your life, among thousands of benefits we can mention the following: Gives us security: our self-esteem level will rise because it allows us to act with confidence in different commercial transactions and worry of not having enough free. Allows you to give satisfaction to the beings that we love: with money we have great chance to share much satisfaction from giving away a car, home until a candy, the important thing is to know that you can draw smiles on many faces through the money, then money is also able to give joy. Part of health is related to money: through money can improve our quality of life, paying medical assistance, having a healthy diet, enjoying an excellent recreation. Has the most is because it gives more: many people do not analyze this aspect and see people originally as selfish, perhaps has its exceptions as in everything, but in general we see that the accumulation of money is due to give more than ourselves, for example consider the benefits of selling bread at the corner of our neighborhood, provides employment for 2 people and delivers benefits say 200 daily buyers, but on the other hand there is a great bakery with 150 employees that delivers product to 12,000 customers per day, then who is granting more? Logically the great bakery, then is a normal consequence that receive more, that much is clear for a person who is aware of abundance. Money is infinite: how? At first it sounds illogical, but it is certainly so, you should know that making money is due to the level of a country’s production, now do much new can produce? Because there are endless possibilities, furniture, vegetables, fruits, songs, books, fashions, programs, etc. .
What have been some of the reasons that has led to this lack of quality in the education of these universities? We could point out among some: profiles of professionals ill-defined, not adapted to what reality requires absence of teachers with responsibilities, well-defined, involving quality in their knowledge, pedagogy, proactivity, innovation creativity, vision little integration in the relevance and scope of what the research represents, poor use of her, untying with the realities that the country faces untying with out-of-date programs of government programs of different racesUntying with sectors of health, business and even other universities inadequate utilization of the human capital of the talent of the University community absence of transformations required to ensure academic excellence poor service management absence in the authorities of an efficient education management weak administrative systems excessive bureaucracy waste of opportunities that will generate the linked and properly use ICT. Anchoring in racing offering already not suitable to the reality of the current scenarios. Specifically, the University authorities must commit themselves to restructure all the aspects that involocrua an academic quality assurance. In this regard, is interesting which indicates Vistremundo Aguila, that we have in mind, that to develop a process of evaluation and accreditation of the University, not enough quality with a philosophical or academic of the concept definition, it is necessary to define a concept of quality with certain features that allow you to: Be operational, i.e. be able to translate into easily manageable elements within a guide, model or assessment procedure. Covering of one form or another the substantive functions of the University Take implicit concept of assessment or appreciation. Be linked to the social relevance. In conclusion, the crisis faced by the Venezuelan universities where their quality of higher education has been affected, urge that the authorities commit themselves to rescue her, because the country before the turbulence that currently present need of well-trained professionals, taking into account that for example on this aspect says Fredy Hardy Wompner Gallardo, that vocational training should be repensada to resolve what they actually should teach in undergraduate and be able to separate important accessory, which will undoubtedly result in a restatement of the organisation of higher education. .
None of us, or possibly the undersigned so believe it, we can say that the concept of democracy still imperfect, it is the least bad system for good governance of the countries.However, the substance of a democracy, and to my modest understanding, is that, the citizens with their votes, have chosen, and for a period of time, seek to those that govern them: good, regular or bad, but that govern them and not cheat on them until the next general elections. When we are not compliant with the results of the votes, without a doubt, we will have to wait to return to vote for people that we believe best suited to represent us, and say people, not parties to whom today we are voting on in Spain. And it is that the first Government of Spanish democracy output URNs (July 15, 1977), was headed by Adolfo Suarez (true architect of the Spanish transition UCD).But in my humble opinion is He paid a very high price: the creation of the 17 Spanish autonomies, whose current Presidents regard them as Viceroys of new Spain: democracy had a price. I know that to accept our fledgling democracy born in 1978, and everyone we know, it was necessary to accept the establishment of 17 autonomies and two autonomous cities (Ceuta and Melilla), which have proved to be, economically speaking, disastrous for Spain and its citizens. What costly emerging us ones and others! And I repeat it: we have 17 viceroys in the Iberian Peninsula. Former President Adolfo Suarez, true architect of the transition. The Spanish Government actual-presidido by Mr Rodriguez Zapatero-, is undergoing very unfortunate moments in terms of the Spanish economy. Possibly, and on the eve of the upcoming electoral campaigns for the municipal and the regional on Sunday May 22 of this year, turno-Gobierno and opposition politicians will begin to tell white lies and half-truths, that they themselves will not believe them and, what is more regrettable, making them believe others: it has always been so democracy, price and today is an unfinished business very difficult adopted by the Socialist government politicians and popular opposition politicians: both have forgotten – because so wanted it for their own interests politicians-, which, no doubt, could have ruled and formed a coalition Government, and then Spain would not be weakened, financially speaking, as it is.